GEMIX vs. PMBMX
GEMIX (Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and PMBMX (Principal MidCap Fund) are both mutual funds - GEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while PMBMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, GEMIX returned 10.66%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for PMBMX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GEMIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for PMBMX.
Performance
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEMIX achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly higher than PMBMX's -7.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GEMIX has underperformed PMBMX with an annualized return of 10.66%, while PMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.
GEMIX
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 27.26%
- 6M
- 28.23%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
PMBMX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -7.31%
- 6M
- -8.84%
- 1Y
- -10.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMIX Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 27.26% | 32.84% | 9.10% | 6.63% | -30.01% | -2.48% | 30.98% | 26.06% | -20.60% | 48.32% |
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | -7.31% | 1.16% | 23.38% | 25.36% | -23.52% | 24.63% | 17.69% | 49.09% | -7.28% | 24.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEMIX and PMBMX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2000 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GEMIX and PMBMX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEMIX vs. PMBMX — Risk / Return Rank
GEMIX
PMBMX
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEMIX | PMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.91 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | -0.49 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | -1.01 | +15.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.46%, which is greater than PMBMX's maximum drawdown of -50.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMIX and PMBMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEMIX | PMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.46% | -50.69% | -17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.65% | -19.53% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.46% | -19.53% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.71% | -31.48% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | -40.60% | -6.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -13.52% | +7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -6.74% | -12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 9.38% | -5.71% |
Volatility
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) at 4.42%. This indicates that GEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEMIX | PMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 4.42% | +8.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.68% | 11.69% | +8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 14.67% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 18.71% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 19.17% | -0.75% |
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PMBMX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEMIX vs. PMBMX - Dividend Comparison
GEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than PMBMX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMIX Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.61% | 0.78% | 1.09% | 1.33% | 0.22% | 0.95% | 0.31% | 1.09% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 1.09% | 0.10% |
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | 6.91% | 6.41% | 6.86% | 2.68% | 3.43% | 8.51% | 1.15% | 9.00% | 12.79% | 3.39% | 2.16% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEMIX and PMBMX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEMIX has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to PMBMX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMIX dropped -68.46% vs PMBMX's -50.69%.
GEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEMIX and PMBMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer