PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEMIX vs. MBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEMIX vs. MBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEMIX achieves a 32.84% return, which is significantly higher than MBB's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GEMIX has outperformed MBB with an annualized return of 10.83%, while MBB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


GEMIX

1D
1.15%
1M
9.85%
YTD
32.84%
6M
36.33%
1Y
63.53%
3Y*
25.51%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.83%

MBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.71%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEMIX vs. MBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEMIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.84%32.84%9.10%6.63%-30.01%-2.48%30.98%26.06%-20.60%48.32%
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
0.58%8.38%1.31%5.01%-11.74%-1.43%4.08%6.18%0.82%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GEMIX and MBB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007

-0.05

The correlation between GEMIX and MBB shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEMIX vs. MBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEMIX
GEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MBB
MBB Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEMIX vs. MBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEMIXMBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.27

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

2.31

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.38

7.64

+10.74

GEMIX vs. MBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the MBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEMIX and MBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEMIXMBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

1.51

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.05

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.25

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.58

-0.21

Drawdowns

GEMIX vs. MBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.46%, which is greater than MBB's maximum drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMIX and MBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMIXMBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.46%

-17.64%

-50.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.65%

-2.94%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.46%

-7.68%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.71%

-17.19%

-27.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

-17.64%

-29.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.52%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-2.35%

-17.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

0.89%

+2.59%

Volatility

GEMIX vs. MBB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB) at 1.59%. This indicates that GEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMIXMBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

1.59%

+7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

3.23%

+13.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

4.51%

+14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

6.81%

+10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

5.31%

+12.79%

GEMIX vs. MBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEMIX vs. MBB - Dividend Comparison

GEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than MBB's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEMIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.58%0.78%1.09%1.33%0.22%0.95%0.31%1.09%0.79%0.88%1.09%0.10%
MBB
iShares MBS Bond ETF
4.28%4.21%3.94%3.40%2.31%1.05%2.10%2.77%2.64%2.23%2.58%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEMIX and MBB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEMIX has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to MBB (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMIX dropped -68.46% vs MBB's -17.64%.

GEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEMIX and MBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer