GEMG vs. NBIL
GEMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF) and NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GEMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NBIL.
Performance
GEMG vs. NBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEMG achieves a -90.30% return, which is significantly lower than NBIL's 465.39% return.
GEMG
- 1D
- -11.64%
- 1M
- -41.26%
- YTD
- -90.30%
- 6M
- -92.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL
- 1D
- -11.50%
- 1M
- 34.60%
- YTD
- 465.39%
- 6M
- 376.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEMG vs. NBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEMG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF | -90.30% | -71.91% |
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 465.39% | -49.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEMG and NBIL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEMG vs. NBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF (GEMG) and GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEMG vs. NBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEMG drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than NBIL's maximum drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMG and NBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEMG | NBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -77.87% | -19.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.43% | -19.04% | -78.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.27% | -42.58% | -38.69% |
Volatility
GEMG vs. NBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEMG | NBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.02% | 198.64% | +20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.02% | 198.64% | +20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.02% | 198.64% | +20.38% |
GEMG vs. NBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NBIL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEMG vs. NBIL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEMG nor NBIL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEMG and NBIL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
GEMG and NBIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEMG and 1.50% for NBIL.
Find the right allocation for GEMG and NBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer