PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEME vs. TUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEME vs. TUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEME achieves a 38.52% return, which is significantly higher than TUR's 13.80% return.


GEME

1D
-1.23%
1M
10.91%
YTD
38.52%
6M
44.89%
1Y
82.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TUR

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.70%
YTD
13.80%
6M
17.95%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEME vs. TUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GEME and TUR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEME vs. TUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEME
GEME Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GEME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEME Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEME Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GEME Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEME Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TUR
TUR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEME vs. TUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEMETURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.22

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.15

1.76

+4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.06

5.22

+18.83

GEME vs. TUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEME Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the TUR Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEME and TUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEMETURDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90

1.12

+2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.66

0.04

+2.62

Drawdowns

GEME vs. TUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEME drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum TUR drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEME and TUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMETURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.86%

-72.34%

+55.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-16.07%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-28.38%

+27.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-39.90%

+37.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

5.40%

-1.97%

Volatility

GEME vs. TUR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) is 8.56%, while iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) has a volatility of 14.06%. This indicates that GEME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMETURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

14.06%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

19.90%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.23%

25.28%

-4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

34.15%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

34.39%

-11.44%

GEME vs. TUR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEME has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TUR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEME vs. TUR - Dividend Comparison

GEME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than TUR's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEME
Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF
5.06%7.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
2.11%2.40%1.79%4.43%1.97%4.22%0.87%3.29%4.05%2.64%2.89%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEME and TUR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUR has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to GEME (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEME dropped -16.86% vs TUR's -72.34%.

On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 82.30% vs 28.13% for TUR. On fees, TUR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GEME has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 82.30% return vs 28.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.

GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 2.11% for TUR.

They also come from different issuers: Pacific AM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEME and 0.59% for TUR.

GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEME and TUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer