PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXY vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -15.78% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 35.90% return.


GDXY

1D
-4.14%
1M
-9.62%
YTD
-15.78%
6M
-19.56%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-5.90%
1M
5.93%
YTD
35.90%
6M
38.06%
1Y
82.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-15.78%88.08%-12.53%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.90%41.00%8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and TSMY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXYTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

5.35

-4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

19.38

-18.01

GDXY vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXYTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-31.15%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.16%

-15.50%

-18.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.39%

-5.90%

-26.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-5.44%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.81%

4.27%

+8.54%

Volatility

GDXY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 13.61%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXYTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

13.61%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.29%

25.03%

+8.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.62%

31.14%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.58%

33.94%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.58%

33.94%

-1.36%

GDXY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.76%, more than TSMY's 51.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
78.76%52.13%23.91%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
51.03%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXY and TSMY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to TSMY (13.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.16% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 82.45% vs 17.53% for GDXY. On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 13.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 82.45% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 78.76%, compared with 51.03% for TSMY.

GDXY is categorized as Gold, while TSMY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.99% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXY and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer