PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXY vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXY vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -17.00% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 11.28% return.


GDXY

1D
0.30%
1M
-5.34%
6M
-20.79%
YTD
-17.00%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
2.66%
1M
2.18%
6M
11.30%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
51.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-17.00%88.08%-11.84%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
11.28%27.38%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and NVDY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXY vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXYNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.18

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.91

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

4.49

-3.35

GDXY vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.98%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXYNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.98%

-34.08%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.98%

-14.67%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.37%

-8.13%

-25.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-6.29%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.75%

6.21%

+8.54%

Volatility

GDXY vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 12.51% compared to YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) at 8.30%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXYNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

8.30%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.17%

21.85%

+11.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

28.51%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

38.01%

-5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.57%

38.01%

-5.44%

GDXY vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXY vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.15%, more than NVDY's 65.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
84.15%52.13%23.91%0.00%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
65.67%83.10%83.65%22.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXY and NVDY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to NVDY (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.98% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 27.41% vs 15.98% for GDXY. On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVDY has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 27.41% return vs 15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 84.15%, compared with 65.67% for NVDY.

GDXY is categorized as Gold, while NVDY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXY and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer