PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXY vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXY vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -12.32% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return.


GDXY

1D
2.43%
1M
-14.26%
YTD
-12.32%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.32%88.08%-11.84%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%41.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and NVDA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXY vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXYNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.07

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

4.94

-3.11

GDXY vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXYNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-89.72%

+55.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.16%

-20.21%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.61%

-12.86%

-16.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-36.18%

+29.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.05%

8.46%

+3.59%

Volatility

GDXY vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 13.26%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXYNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.51%

13.26%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.60%

26.67%

+5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.00%

35.00%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.36%

51.76%

-19.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.36%

49.84%

-17.48%

Dividends

GDXY vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.04%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
82.04%52.13%23.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXY and NVDA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.16% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXY and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer