PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXY vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -17.00% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -34.22% return.


GDXY

1D
0.30%
1M
-5.34%
6M
-20.79%
YTD
-17.00%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
0.79%
1M
-21.68%
6M
-35.96%
YTD
-34.22%
1Y
-73.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-17.00%88.08%-11.84%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-34.22%-42.71%49.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and MSTY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXYMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.76

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.94

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

-1.40

+2.54

GDXY vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.98%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXYMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.98%

-77.40%

+42.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.98%

-77.40%

+42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.37%

-74.14%

+40.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-27.93%

+20.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.75%

51.98%

-37.23%

Volatility

GDXY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is 12.51%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.73%. This indicates that GDXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXYMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

23.73%

-11.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.17%

53.10%

-19.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

64.53%

-25.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

72.37%

-39.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.57%

72.37%

-39.80%

GDXY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.15%, less than MSTY's 283.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
84.15%52.13%23.91%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
283.56%294.61%104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (23.73%) compared to GDXY (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.98% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 15.98% vs -73.21% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 15.98% return vs -73.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 283.56%, compared with 84.15% for GDXY.

GDXY is categorized as Gold, while MSTY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.99% for MSTY.

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXY and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer