GDXU vs. QCN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO).
GDXU and QCN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. QCN.TO is a passively managed fund by Mackenzie that tracks the performance of the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. It was launched on Jan 24, 2018. Both GDXU and QCN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | -10.52% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.66% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 3.18% | 38.15% | 12.31% | 13.82% | -11.77% | 25.57% | 2.22% |
Different Trading Currencies
GDXU is traded in USD, while QCN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QCN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than QCN.TO's 3.18% return.
GDXU
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -37.51%
- YTD
- -10.52%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 270.85%
- 3Y*
- 57.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
QCN.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 37.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCN.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. QCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
QCN.TO
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXU | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.19 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 2.86 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.63 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 15.67 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXU | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.19 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.77 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.57 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and QCN.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 3.37% | 3.26% | 2.45% | 3.02% | 3.07% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than QCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and QCN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -36.90% | -57.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.16% | -9.43% | -63.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.34% | -16.30% | -77.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.47% | -3.99% | -54.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.96% | -3.70% | -66.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.33% | 2.44% | +23.89% |
Volatility
GDXU vs. QCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 53.03% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) at 6.18%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 53.03% | 6.18% | +46.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 122.31% | 12.24% | +110.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.41% | 17.16% | +123.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.00% | 16.90% | +92.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.00% | 19.11% | +89.89% |