GDX.L vs. TREG.L
GDX.L (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) and TREG.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF, while TREG.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX.L returned 10.47%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for TREG.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX.L charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TREG.L.
Performance
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GDX.L is traded in USD, while TREG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX.L achieves a -14.33% return, which is significantly lower than TREG.L's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX.L has outperformed TREG.L with an annualized return of 10.47%, while TREG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.
GDX.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -14.29%
- 6M
- -24.08%
- YTD
- -14.33%
- 1Y
- 45.65%
- 3Y*
- 33.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
TREG.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 16.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | -14.33% | 156.68% | 9.22% | 9.69% | -7.72% | -11.80% | 23.54% | 43.20% | -10.18% | 7.61% |
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 9.88% | 14.68% | 1.06% | 13.30% | -25.65% | 30.14% | -7.29% | 7.67% | -5.85% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX.L and TREG.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015 | 0.17 |
The correlation between GDX.L and TREG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX.L vs. TREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GDX.L
TREG.L
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDX.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDX.L | TREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.50 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 5.11 | -2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, roughly equal to the maximum TREG.L drawdown of -52.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX.L and TREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX.L | TREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.37% | -52.53% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.20% | -10.92% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | -17.05% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.52% | -33.44% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.37% | -43.09% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.87% | -0.98% | -34.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.70% | -16.86% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.97% | 3.22% | +12.75% |
Volatility
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDX.L) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) at 3.73%. This indicates that GDX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX.L | TREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.82% | 3.73% | +11.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.73% | 10.17% | +28.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.46% | 12.43% | +35.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 16.74% | +20.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 18.15% | +16.91% |
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX.L has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than TREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX.L vs. TREG.L - Dividend Comparison
GDX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.34% | 3.57% | 3.48% | 3.64% | 4.54% | 1.82% | 4.49% | 3.41% | 3.83% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX.L and TREG.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for GDX.L.
GDX.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while TREG.L is REIT. GDX.L tracks VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF, while TREG.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for GDX.L and 0.25% for TREG.L.
Find the right allocation for GDX.L and TREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer