PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX.AX achieves a -20.75% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT.AX's -1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX.AX has underperformed MOAT.AX with an annualized return of 11.04%, while MOAT.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


GDX.AX

1D
-3.37%
1M
-17.51%
6M
-28.87%
YTD
-20.75%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
31.73%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
11.04%

MOAT.AX

1D
0.91%
1M
4.30%
6M
-5.26%
YTD
-1.90%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX.AX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-20.75%143.80%19.59%10.67%-1.08%-8.19%13.31%45.23%-1.28%-1.16%
MOAT.AX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.90%5.68%20.43%30.52%-7.38%30.97%3.35%36.19%9.68%12.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX.AX and MOAT.AX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2015

-0.04

The correlation between GDX.AX and MOAT.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (10 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX.AX
GDX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GDX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT.AX
MOAT.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MOAT.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDX.AXMOAT.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.34

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

0.70

+1.09

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the MOAT.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX.AX and MOAT.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX.AX drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, which is greater than MOAT.AX's maximum drawdown of -23.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX.AX and MOAT.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDX.AXMOAT.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-23.63%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.41%

-15.16%

-23.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.41%

-19.11%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.41%

-19.11%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.51%

-23.63%

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.41%

-5.26%

-33.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-3.97%

-15.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.31%

7.59%

+9.72%

Volatility

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX.AX) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX) at 3.42%. This indicates that GDX.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDX.AXMOAT.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.09%

3.42%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.11%

9.67%

+27.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.56%

12.27%

+32.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.62%

14.96%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.51%

15.47%

+18.04%

Dividends

GDX.AX vs. MOAT.AX - Dividend Comparison

GDX.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.48%, more than MOAT.AX's 9.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX.AX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
20.48%0.48%1.35%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.45%0.55%0.87%0.00%0.39%1.33%
MOAT.AX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
9.96%5.78%7.39%6.87%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.12%2.52%0.00%1.78%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX.AX and MOAT.AX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX.AX is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while MOAT.AX is Global Equities. GDX.AX tracks VanEck Gold Miners Index, while MOAT.AX tracks VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX.AX and MOAT.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer