PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MOAT.AX (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and CNEW.AX (VanEck China New Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Index, while CNEW.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader China New Economy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOAT.AX returned 9.50%/yr vs -1.69%/yr for CNEW.AX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX) and VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT.AX achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than CNEW.AX's 1.87% return.

MOAT.AX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.39%
6M
-5.09%
YTD
-2.79%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
14.17%

CNEW.AX

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.64%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
1.87%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
-1.69%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOAT.AX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		-2.79%5.68%20.43%30.52%-7.38%30.97%3.35%36.19%-2.57%
CNEW.AX
VanEck China New Economy ETF		1.87%15.14%11.63%-7.15%-26.85%14.22%26.35%40.10%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT.AX and CNEW.AX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

VanEck China New Economy ETF

Return for Risk

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOAT.AX
MOAT.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MOAT.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX
CNEW.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CNEW.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX) and VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MOAT.AXCNEW.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.44
0.61

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.70
1.00

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.13

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.87

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.72

2.09

-1.38

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the CNEW.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT.AX and CNEW.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT.AX drawdown since its inception was -23.63%, smaller than the maximum CNEW.AX drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT.AX and CNEW.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOAT.AXCNEW.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.63%

-46.20%

+22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.16%

-13.25%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-27.71%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.11%

-46.20%

+27.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.63%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.11%

-13.40%

+7.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-17.27%

+13.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

5.61%

+1.98%

Volatility

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT.AX) is 3.66%, while VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that MOAT.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNEW.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOAT.AXCNEW.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.62%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

15.27%

-5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

18.99%

-6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

24.49%

-9.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

24.61%

-9.14%

Dividends

MOAT.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Dividend Comparison

MOAT.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than CNEW.AX's 0.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNEW.AX
VanEck China New Economy ETF		0.74%0.88%1.71%1.72%1.86%1.03%1.40%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT.AX
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		10.05%5.78%7.39%6.87%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.12%2.52%0.00%1.78%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOAT.AX and CNEW.AX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while CNEW.AX is China Equities. MOAT.AX tracks VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Index, while CNEW.AX tracks MarketGrader China New Economy Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT.AX and CNEW.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer