GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO
GDV.TO (Global Dividend Growth Split Corp.) is a stock, while UMAX.TO (Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Over the past year, GDV.TO returned 38.88% vs 14.15% for UMAX.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDV.TO achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than UMAX.TO's 9.02% return.
GDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 17.22%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- —
UMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 14.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDV.TO Global Dividend Growth Split Corp. | 17.22% | 19.30% | 48.36% | -3.37% |
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.02% | 9.95% | 5.97% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDV.TO and UMAX.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.31 |
The correlation between GDV.TO and UMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GDV.TO
UMAX.TO
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Dividend Growth Split Corp. (GDV.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDV.TO | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.78 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 9.65 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDV.TO | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.14 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.01 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, which is greater than UMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDV.TO and UMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDV.TO | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.09% | -10.09% | -48.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.51% | -5.11% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.25% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -2.05% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.48% | +1.56% |
Volatility
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global Dividend Growth Split Corp. (GDV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) at 1.92%. This indicates that GDV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDV.TO | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 1.92% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 5.53% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 6.65% | +9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 8.67% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 8.67% | +22.53% |
Dividends
GDV.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
GDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, less than UMAX.TO's 13.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDV.TO Global Dividend Growth Split Corp. | 8.80% | 10.41% | 11.99% | 15.58% | 12.90% | 11.83% | 13.14% | 12.30% | 9.10% |
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.97% | 14.86% | 14.81% | 6.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDV.TO and UMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GDV.TO and UMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer