GDOG vs. MNRS
GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDOG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.
Performance
GDOG vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOG achieves a -37.56% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 11.06% return.
GDOG
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -15.91%
- 6M
- -47.50%
- YTD
- -37.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNRS
- 1D
- -7.89%
- 1M
- -30.06%
- 6M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDOG vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | -37.56% | -19.74% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 11.06% | -1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOG and MNRS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOG vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank
GDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MNRS
GDOG vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOG | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOG vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOG drawdown since its inception was -53.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MNRS drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOG and MNRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOG | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.90% | -56.70% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.97% | -38.78% | -14.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.09% | -23.57% | -8.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.02% | — |
Volatility
GDOG vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOG | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.69% | 72.04% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.69% | 70.79% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.69% | 70.79% | -0.10% |
GDOG vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOG vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison
GDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.49% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOG and MNRS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MNRS.
MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for GDOG.
GDOG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GDOG and 0.59% for MNRS.
Find the right allocation for GDOG and MNRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer