PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDLC vs. MSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDLC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDLC

1D
-3.29%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-28.93%
6M
-33.67%
1Y
-33.81%
3Y*
64.48%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDLC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and MSBT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDLC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDLC
GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MSBT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDLC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDLCMSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

GDLC vs. MSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDLCMSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

-1.33

+1.63

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and MSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDLCMSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.14%

-20.25%

-73.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.28%

-20.25%

-34.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-3.91%

-48.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.04%

Volatility

GDLC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDLCMSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.54%

32.92%

+15.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.43%

32.92%

+41.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.91%

32.92%

+60.99%

GDLC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDLC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDLC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GDLC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.

GDLC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.14% for MSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDLC and MSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer