GDLC vs. MSBT
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GDLC tracks the CoinDesk 5 Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
GDLC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -17.46%
- YTD
- -32.51%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- 1Y
- -38.54%
- 3Y*
- 49.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -11.71% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and MSBT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
MSBT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDLC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -26.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -26.46% | -67.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.58% | -23.99% | -32.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.78% | -8.48% | -44.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.36% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.09% | 37.06% | +12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.78% | 37.06% | +36.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 37.06% | +57.12% |
GDLC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDLC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GDLC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDLC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer