GDLC vs. MSBT
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GDLC tracks the CoinDesk 5 Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
GDLC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -33.67%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- 64.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -9.88% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and MSBT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
MSBT
GDLC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -1.33 | +1.63 |
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -20.25% | -73.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -20.25% | -34.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -3.91% | -48.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.04% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 32.92% | +15.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.43% | 32.92% | +41.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.91% | 32.92% | +60.99% |
GDLC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDLC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GDLC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDLC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer