GDLC vs. EZBC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GDLC tracks the CoinDesk 5 Index while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GDLC returned -38.54% vs -39.76% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

GDLC vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -32.51% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -28.83% return.

GDLC

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -17.46%
• YTD: -32.51%
• 6M: -32.63%
• 1Y: -38.54%
• 3Y*: 49.72%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: -17.79%
• YTD: -28.83%
• 6M: -28.96%
• 1Y: -39.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDLC vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-32.51%	0.45%	141.57%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-28.83%	-6.56%	87.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and EZBC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.90

The correlation between GDLC and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 3
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDLC vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDLC	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	-0.90	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	-1.26	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.86	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	-0.77	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	-1.30	+0.15

GDLC vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is comparable to the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-52.07%	-42.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.34%	-52.07%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.58%	-50.46%	-6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.78%	-16.89%	-35.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.36%	30.56%	+2.80%

Volatility

GDLC vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 13.04%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	13.04%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.82%	34.61%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.09%	44.23%	+4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.78%	50.15%	+23.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.18%	50.15%	+44.03%

GDLC vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDLC vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDLC nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDLC and EZBC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, GDLC and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GDLC or EZBC?

GDLC has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to EZBC (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs EZBC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, GDLC or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, GDLC leads with -38.54% vs -39.76% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 13.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDLC or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, GDLC has performed better with a -38.54% return vs -39.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDLC or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDLC or EZBC?

GDLC and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GDLC and EZBC?

GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.79 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.