GDLC vs. CSHP
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GDLC is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GDLC returned -33.81% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
GDLC vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -33.67%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- 64.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -28.93% | 0.45% | 80.89% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and CSHP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between GDLC and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
CSHP
GDLC vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -32.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 7.44 | -6.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 65.71 | -66.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 432.16 | -433.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 11.91 | -12.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 10.75 | -10.46 |
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -0.08% | -94.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | -0.06% | -52.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | 0.00% | -54.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -0.00% | -52.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.04% | 0.01% | +31.03% |
Volatility
GDLC vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 0.07% | +9.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | 0.24% | +36.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 0.33% | +48.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.43% | 0.40% | +74.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.91% | 0.40% | +93.51% |
GDLC vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and CSHP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDLC has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -33.81% for GDLC. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.
GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer