GDLC vs. CSHP
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GDLC is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GDLC returned -42.90% vs 3.89% for CSHP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
GDLC vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -35.19% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.79% return.
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -20.75%
- YTD
- -35.19%
- 6M
- -34.92%
- 1Y
- -42.90%
- 3Y*
- 47.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -35.19% | 0.45% | 72.35% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.79% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and CSHP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between GDLC and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
CSHP
GDLC vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -27.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 6.09 | -5.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 48.60 | -49.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 338.28 | -339.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -0.08% | -94.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.55% | -0.08% | -56.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.31% | -0.08% | -58.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.78% | -0.00% | -52.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.55% | 0.01% | +33.54% |
Volatility
GDLC vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 0.16% | +13.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.63% | 0.27% | +36.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.16% | 0.36% | +48.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.77% | 0.41% | +73.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.17% | 0.41% | +93.76% |
GDLC vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and CSHP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDLC has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.89% vs -42.90% for GDLC. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.89% return vs -42.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.
GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.81 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer