GDLC vs. CBOO
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. GDLC is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
GDLC vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -30.16% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.43% return.
GDLC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -19.67%
- YTD
- -30.16%
- 1Y
- -42.29%
- 3Y*
- 49.03%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.89%
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.13K | $27.46K | $18.88K | |
| $1.36M | $1.40M | $1.44M |
GDLC vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -30.16% | -32.95% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.43% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and CBOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDLC vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDLC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -2.34% | -91.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.07% | -1.26% | -53.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.83% | -1.58% | -51.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.88% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.03% | 1.95% | +47.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.69% | 1.95% | +69.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.49% | 1.95% | +91.54% |
GDLC vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and CBOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDLC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDLC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.
GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer