PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDIG.L vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIG.L achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


GDIG.L

1D
-2.61%
1M
4.00%
YTD
17.71%
6M
26.04%
1Y
86.92%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
17.71%90.59%-8.68%4.57%3.63%7.14%31.37%25.35%-16.37%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIG.L and SRVR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.27

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDIG.L
SRVR

Basic Materials

93.9%
0.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.8%

Industrials

1.0%
11.7%

Technology

0.8%
6.8%

Communication Services

-

7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

66.4%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Basic Materials

GDIG.L
93.9%
SRVR
0.8%

Energy

GDIG.L
4.3%
SRVR
3.8%

Industrials

GDIG.L
1.0%
SRVR
11.7%

Technology

GDIG.L
0.8%
SRVR
6.8%

Communication Services

GDIG.L

-

SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GDIG.L

-

SRVR

-

Consumer Defensive

GDIG.L

-

SRVR

-

Financial Services

GDIG.L

-

SRVR
0.9%

Healthcare

GDIG.L

-

SRVR

-

Real Estate

GDIG.L

-

SRVR
66.4%

Utilities

GDIG.L

-

SRVR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDIG.L vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIG.L
GDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDIG.LSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

0.76

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

1.64

+10.08

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIG.L and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDIG.LSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.67

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.04

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.30

+0.24

Drawdowns

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIG.L and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDIG.LSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.03%

-40.99%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.08%

-14.78%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-18.34%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-40.99%

+0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-12.28%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-15.27%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.39%

6.83%

+0.56%

Volatility

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) at 5.47%. This indicates that GDIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDIG.LSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.50%

5.47%

+7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.02%

13.12%

+15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.78%

16.72%

+18.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.31%

19.71%

+11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

21.44%

+8.49%

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDIG.L vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

GDIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDIG.L and SRVR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDIG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDIG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

GDIG.L is categorized as Materials, while SRVR is REIT. GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIG.L and 0.60% for SRVR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDIG.L and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer