GDGIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GDGIX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 29, 2008. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGIX Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund | -5.53% | 16.68% | 16.80% | 23.12% | -18.05% | 23.59% | 16.01% | 26.70% | -9.65% | 19.75% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDGIX achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GDGIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
GDGIX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- -5.53%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDGIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDGIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GDGIX
CSUAX
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 2.17 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.36 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 10.32 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.61 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.55 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDGIX and CSUAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GDGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGIX Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund | 1.46% | 1.38% | 2.47% | 1.03% | 1.11% | 0.69% | 1.03% | 1.59% | 1.93% | 1.50% | 2.11% | 9.52% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDGIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -52.20% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -7.98% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.60% | -20.45% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.91% | -35.05% | +1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.09% | -4.38% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -8.49% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.83% | +0.37% |
Volatility
GDGIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GDGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDGIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.26% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 6.89% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 11.48% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 12.89% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 14.89% | +1.45% |