GDGIX vs. FDVV
GDGIX (Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both funds - GDGIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Sit, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Over the past 5 years, GDGIX returned 10.40%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDGIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDGIX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 12.19% return.
GDGIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.69%
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.25M | $48.28M | $45.73M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGIX Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund | 10.77% | 16.68% | 16.80% | 23.12% | -18.05% | 23.59% | 16.01% | 26.70% | -9.65% | 19.75% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 12.19% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDGIX and FDVV is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GDGIX and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDGIX vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
GDGIX
FDVV
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDGIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.21 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 9.10 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDGIX and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDGIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -40.25% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -9.30% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -15.90% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.60% | -20.18% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.12% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -3.76% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.26% | -0.22% |
Volatility
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.04%. This indicates that GDGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDGIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 3.04% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 8.35% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 10.37% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 14.68% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 16.91% | -0.56% |
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDGIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDGIX vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
GDGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than FDVV's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.76% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
GDGIX Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund | 1.24% | 1.38% | 2.47% | 1.03% | 1.11% | 0.69% | 1.03% | 1.59% | 1.93% | 1.50% | 2.11% | 9.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDGIX and FDVV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDGIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FDVV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDGIX dropped -33.91% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDGIX and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer