PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GD vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GD vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has outperformed T with an annualized return of 12.34%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


GD

1D
0.55%
1M
6.35%
6M
1.79%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
12.34%
ALL TIME*
15.59%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GD vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
11.53%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GD and T is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.28

The correlation between GD and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GD:

$100.22B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

GD:

$15.89

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

GD:

23.33

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

GD:

2.95

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

GD:

1.88

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

GD:

$53.81B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GD:

$7.48B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

GD:

$6.26B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GD vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.92

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

-0.46

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

-1.03

+7.10

GD vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GD vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.67%

-64.15%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-28.89%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.55%

-28.89%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-32.01%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

-42.35%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-21.57%

+19.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-15.74%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

12.94%

-8.62%

Volatility

GD vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is 7.13%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that GD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

9.59%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

19.91%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

23.72%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

24.38%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

23.92%

-1.13%

Dividends

GD vs. T - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.67%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

GD vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Dynamics Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
13.48B
33.47B
(GD) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GD and T have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to GD (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs T's -64.15%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GD and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer