GD vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GD (General Dynamics Corporation) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. Over the past 10 years, GD returned 11.59%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GD vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 11.59%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.

GD

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 14.60%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

JNJ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GD vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GD General Dynamics Corporation	2.13%	30.39%	3.52%	7.13%	21.69%	43.77%	-13.14%	14.80%	-21.34%	19.85%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	13.43%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	11.44%	10.82%	16.22%	-5.13%	24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GD and JNJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977	0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap GD : $93.43B JNJ : $567.68B
EPS GD : $15.92 JNJ : $8.65
PE Ratio GD : 21.41 JNJ : 26.85
PEG Ratio GD : 2.71 JNJ : 0.89
PS Ratio GD : 1.73 JNJ : 5.86
PB Ratio GD : 3.58 JNJ : 6.99
Total Revenue (TTM) GD : $53.81B JNJ : $96.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) GD : $7.48B JNJ : $66.60B
EBITDA (TTM) GD : $6.26B JNJ : $31.62B

Return for Risk

GD vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD

GD Risk / Return Rank: 76
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GD	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	3.19	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	4.65	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.57	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	4.91	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	14.52	-8.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GD vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GD	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	3.19	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.60	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.55	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.54	+0.03

Drawdowns

GD vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GD	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.67%	-50.67%	-25.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.53%	-10.96%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.55%	-15.95%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.55%	-18.41%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.63%	-27.37%	-24.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	-6.06%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.61%	-11.88%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	3.70%	+0.49%

Volatility

GD vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GD	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.72%	5.80%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.14%	12.41%	+4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.02%	16.87%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	16.87%	+3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.71%	18.47%	+4.24%

Dividends

GD vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than JNJ's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GD General Dynamics Corporation	1.79%	1.76%	2.12%	2.01%	2.00%	2.24%	2.90%	2.26%	2.31%	1.61%	1.72%	1.96%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.26%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%

Financials

GD vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Dynamics Corporation and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GD and JNJ in my portfolio?

GD and JNJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GD or JNJ?

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.