GD vs. BAESY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY).

Performance

GD vs. BAESY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GD vs. BAESY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GD General Dynamics Corporation	2.37%	30.39%	3.52%	7.13%	21.69%	43.77%	-13.14%	14.80%	-21.34%	19.85%
BAESY BAE Systems PLC	25.43%	65.51%	1.23%	40.91%	46.40%	14.56%	-3.43%	34.69%	-22.16%	13.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GD : $94.01B BAESY : $88.35B
EPS GD : $15.47 BAESY : $5.29
PE Ratio GD : 22.19 BAESY : 22.01
PEG Ratio GD : 2.80 BAESY : 4.05
PS Ratio GD : 1.78 BAESY : 1.62
PB Ratio GD : 3.67 BAESY : 7.51
Total Revenue (TTM) GD : $52.55B BAESY : $54.56B
Gross Profit (TTM) GD : $7.26B BAESY : $19.72B
EBITDA (TTM) GD : $6.08B BAESY : $7.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than BAESY's 25.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has underperformed BAESY with an annualized return of 12.44%, while BAESY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.99% annualized return.

GD

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -3.87%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 28.35%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 16.17%
• 10Y*: 12.44%

BAESY

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 44.31%
• 3Y*: 36.22%
• 5Y*: 36.34%
• 10Y*: 19.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GD vs. BAESY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD

GD Risk / Return Rank: 82
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BAESY

BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 77
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. BAESY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and BAE Systems PLC (BAESY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GD	BAESY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.36	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.91	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	1.87	+1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.36	4.71	+5.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GD vs. BAESY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the BAESY Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and BAESY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GD	BAESY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.36	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	1.33	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.73	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.37	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between GD and BAESY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GD vs. BAESY - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than BAESY's 1.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GD General Dynamics Corporation	1.75%	1.76%	2.12%	2.01%	2.00%	2.24%	2.90%	2.26%	2.31%	1.61%	1.72%	1.96%
BAESY BAE Systems PLC	1.52%	1.90%	2.79%	2.40%	3.09%	4.46%	7.05%	3.66%	4.93%	5.71%	6.26%	4.38%

Drawdowns

GD vs. BAESY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than BAESY's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and BAESY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GD	BAESY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.67%	-59.20%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.27%	-23.59%	+13.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.55%	-23.59%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.63%	-42.13%	-9.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-6.33%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.64%	-19.43%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	9.35%	-6.45%

Volatility

GD vs. BAESY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is 4.98%, while BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that GD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAESY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GD	BAESY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	11.44%	-6.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	22.24%	-7.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	32.77%	-10.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.00%	27.48%	-7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.51%	27.56%	-5.05%

Financials

GD vs. BAESY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Dynamics Corporation and BAE Systems PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 14.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.45B and revenue of 14.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.14B and revenue of 14.38B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.