PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCTIX vs. FEQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GCTIX having a 9.95% return and FEQHX slightly higher at 10.01%.


GCTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.48%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.08%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
13.94%

FEQHX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.34%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GCTIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund
9.95%15.35%27.60%23.80%-3.86%
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
10.01%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GCTIX and FEQHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.95

The correlation between GCTIX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCTIX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCTIX
GCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCTIXFEQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.11

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

12.42

-0.05

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FEQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCTIX and FEQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCTIXFEQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.52

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.32

-0.85

Drawdowns

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCTIX drawdown since its inception was -56.62%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCTIX and FEQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCTIXFEQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.62%

-10.42%

-46.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-7.40%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.19%

-10.42%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-2.22%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.85%

+0.34%

Volatility

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.68%. This indicates that GCTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCTIXFEQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.68%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

6.63%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

9.15%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

11.24%

+6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

11.24%

+7.63%

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCTIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCTIX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison

GCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCTIX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund
0.47%0.51%3.06%0.52%0.71%0.42%0.70%0.68%0.10%0.86%0.96%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GCTIX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCTIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCTIX dropped -56.62% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.

FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCTIX and FEQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer