GCSVX vs. SSMHX
GCSVX (Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund) and SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GCSVX returned 3.99%/yr vs 17.17%/yr for SSMHX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCSVX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SSMHX.
Performance
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCSVX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SSMHX's 14.95% return.
GCSVX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -2.68%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSMHX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | -0.98% | -8.94% | 14.70% | 19.92% | -24.73% | 4.24% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 14.95% | 12.90% | 10.73% | 25.21% | -25.43% | 4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCSVX and SSMHX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GCSVX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCSVX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank
GCSVX
SSMHX
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCSVX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 3.04 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 10.97 | -11.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCSVX drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum SSMHX drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSVX and SSMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCSVX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -41.61% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.94% | -10.03% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -30.38% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.02% | -0.20% | -16.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -9.11% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 2.78% | +3.22% |
Volatility
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) is 4.81%, while State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that GCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCSVX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 6.28% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 13.20% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 17.53% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 22.52% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 22.43% | -0.66% |
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCSVX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCSVX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison
GCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than SSMHX's 6.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | 3.23% | 3.20% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 6.20% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 2.31% | 16.30% | 2.91% | 3.65% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 1.71% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCSVX and SSMHX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSMHX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to GCSVX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSVX dropped -33.50% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.
SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCSVX and SSMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer