GCSVX vs. PMEGX
GCSVX (Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund) and PMEGX (T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GCSVX returned 2.48%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for PMEGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GCSVX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PMEGX.
Performance
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCSVX achieves a -2.18% return, which is significantly lower than PMEGX's 3.03% return.
GCSVX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- -4.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.84%
PMEGX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | -2.18% | -8.94% | 14.70% | 19.92% | -24.73% | 4.24% |
PMEGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund | 3.03% | 3.73% | 9.15% | 20.69% | -23.19% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCSVX and PMEGX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GCSVX and PMEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCSVX vs. PMEGX — Risk / Return Rank
GCSVX
PMEGX
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund (PMEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCSVX | PMEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.06 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.41 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 1.39 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCSVX drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum PMEGX drawdown of -55.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSVX and PMEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCSVX | PMEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -55.88% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -10.21% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -27.99% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.03% | -6.20% | -11.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -8.99% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.12% | 3.04% | +3.08% |
Volatility
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Volatility Comparison
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund (GCSVX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund (PMEGX) at 2.50%. This indicates that GCSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCSVX | PMEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 2.50% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 10.49% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 13.64% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 20.11% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 19.75% | +1.87% |
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCSVX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PMEGX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCSVX vs. PMEGX - Dividend Comparison
GCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than PMEGX's 20.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCSVX Geneva SMID Cap Growth Fund | 3.27% | 3.20% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMEGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid Cap Equity Growth Fund | 20.48% | 21.10% | 14.15% | 7.07% | 1.65% | 12.80% | 4.44% | 5.11% | 10.42% | 6.30% | 1.04% | 6.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCSVX and PMEGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCSVX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PMEGX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSVX dropped -33.50% vs PMEGX's -55.88%.
PMEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCSVX and PMEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer