PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCSIX vs. VTMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GCSIX having a 21.72% return and VTMSX slightly higher at 21.93%. Over the past 10 years, GCSIX has outperformed VTMSX with an annualized return of 13.11%, while VTMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.


GCSIX

1D
1.08%
1M
-1.42%
6M
15.31%
YTD
21.72%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
13.11%
ALL TIME*
8.69%

VTMSX

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.56%
6M
15.49%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
36.13%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
21.72%15.66%33.50%19.76%-19.98%23.56%6.95%25.43%-8.82%11.82%
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
21.93%5.93%8.61%15.95%-16.16%27.08%11.05%23.28%-8.62%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GCSIX and VTMSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1999

0.97

The correlation between GCSIX and VTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCSIX vs. VTMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCSIX
GCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMSX
VTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCSIXVTMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.79

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

12.88

+1.28

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VTMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCSIX and VTMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCSIX drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, which is greater than VTMSX's maximum drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSIX and VTMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCSIXVTMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-57.84%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-8.59%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-27.93%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-27.93%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-43.88%

-1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.82%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-8.88%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.53%

+0.27%

Volatility

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX) at 3.47%. This indicates that GCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCSIXVTMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.47%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

11.67%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

17.40%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

21.32%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

23.07%

+0.66%

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCSIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMSX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCSIX vs. VTMSX - Dividend Comparison

GCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than VTMSX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCSIX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund
8.65%10.54%25.02%0.75%0.87%30.90%0.50%0.54%6.50%0.27%0.60%0.58%
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
1.19%1.28%1.44%1.50%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.15%1.26%1.11%1.01%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GCSIX and VTMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCSIX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to VTMSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSIX dropped -63.23% vs VTMSX's -57.84%.

GCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCSIX and VTMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer