GCSIX vs. TISBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCSIX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund) and TISBX (TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GCSIX returned 13.50%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for TISBX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GCSIX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TISBX.

Performance

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCSIX achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than TISBX's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GCSIX has outperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.

GCSIX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 20.38%
• 6M: 19.64%
• 1Y: 45.58%
• 3Y*: 27.76%
• 5Y*: 12.62%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

TISBX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 41.07%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCSIX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund	20.38%	15.66%	33.50%	19.76%	-19.98%	23.56%	6.95%	25.43%	-8.82%	11.82%
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	18.69%	12.72%	11.60%	17.07%	-20.31%	14.85%	20.14%	25.61%	-10.99%	13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GCSIX and TISBX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.98

The correlation between GCSIX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCSIX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCSIX

GCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
GCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TISBX

TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 64
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCSIX	TISBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.28	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.12	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	3.99	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.30	14.14	+3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCSIX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCSIX	TISBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.28	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.30	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.48	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.39	-0.03

Drawdowns

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCSIX drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, which is greater than TISBX's maximum drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCSIX and TISBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCSIX	TISBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.23%	-56.50%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.06%	-10.95%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.19%	-27.44%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.97%	-31.89%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.08%	-41.69%	-3.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.13%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-9.69%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	3.08%	-0.30%

Volatility

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCSIX	TISBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	5.59%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.51%	13.58%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.55%	19.16%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.05%	22.55%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.76%	23.44%	+0.32%

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCSIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCSIX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

GCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than TISBX's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCSIX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund	8.75%	10.54%	25.02%	0.75%	0.87%	30.90%	0.50%	0.54%	6.50%	0.27%	0.60%	0.58%
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	3.47%	4.12%	6.82%	3.09%	1.97%	8.96%	2.65%	5.16%	9.29%	4.49%	4.03%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCSIX and TISBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GCSIX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCSIX or TISBX?

TISBX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to GCSIX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCSIX dropped -63.23% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.