PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCPYX vs. IRONX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCPYX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than IRONX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GCPYX has underperformed IRONX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while IRONX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.70% annualized return.


GCPYX

1D
1.01%
1M
1.40%
6M
6.63%
YTD
7.63%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
8.73%

IRONX

1D
0.99%
1M
1.21%
6M
4.86%
YTD
5.64%
1Y
11.15%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
26.70%
ALL TIME*
18.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
7.63%12.59%18.15%17.59%-11.48%19.28%8.38%16.67%-5.37%12.22%
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
5.64%10.57%14.78%10.61%0.26%13.24%5.91%458.33%1.99%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GCPYX and IRONX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.80

The correlation between GCPYX and IRONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCPYX vs. IRONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCPYX
GCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

IRONX
IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCPYXIRONXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.06

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

7.36

+6.91

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the IRONX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCPYX and IRONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCPYX drawdown since its inception was -25.24%, which is greater than IRONX's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCPYX and IRONX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCPYXIRONXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-13.71%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-5.99%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-11.68%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.33%

-11.68%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

-13.71%

-11.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-1.77%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.67%

-0.38%

Volatility

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Volatility Comparison

Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) at 2.25%. This indicates that GCPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCPYXIRONXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.25%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

5.93%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

8.40%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

9.50%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

40.77%

-28.27%

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCPYX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than IRONX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCPYX vs. IRONX - Dividend Comparison

GCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than IRONX's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
0.39%0.44%0.73%0.92%0.96%0.47%0.82%1.07%1.12%1.03%1.15%1.47%
IRONX
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund
0.06%0.06%0.19%5.17%2.97%13.84%4.16%121.75%8.85%9.93%1.42%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCPYX and IRONX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCPYX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to IRONX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCPYX dropped -25.24% vs IRONX's -13.71%.

GCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCPYX and IRONX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer