PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCMG vs. TKO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCMG vs. TKO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCMG achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than TKO's -12.32% return.


GCMG

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.33%
6M
12.67%
YTD
12.67%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.00%

TKO

1D
-1.09%
1M
-6.49%
6M
-9.54%
YTD
-12.32%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.45M$6.87M$5.98M
$153.48M$196.47M$274.30M

GCMG vs. TKO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.
12.67%-4.35%43.01%16.43%
TKO
TKO Group Holdings Inc.
-12.32%48.92%74.20%-16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GCMG and TKO is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCMG:

$2.33B

TKO:

$13.63B

EPS

GCMG:

$0.31

TKO:

$1.96

PE Ratio

GCMG:

40.01

TKO:

92.55

PEG Ratio

GCMG:

0.33

TKO:

0.19

PS Ratio

GCMG:

4.49

TKO:

7.04

PB Ratio

GCMG:

100.25

TKO:

10.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCMG:

$558.85M

TKO:

$5.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCMG:

$386.19M

TKO:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

GCMG:

$174.90M

TKO:

$1.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCMG vs. TKO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCMG
GCMG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GCMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GCMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

TKO
TKO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TKO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TKO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TKO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TKO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TKO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCMG vs. TKO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCMGTKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.08

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.51

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

0.99

-0.19

GCMG vs. TKO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the TKO Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCMG and TKO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCMG vs. TKO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCMG drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than TKO's maximum drawdown of -28.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCMG and TKO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCMGTKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-28.35%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.41%

-19.61%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

-18.54%

+8.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-8.96%

-13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.87%

10.02%

+2.85%

Volatility

GCMG vs. TKO - Volatility Comparison

GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to TKO Group Holdings Inc. (TKO) at 6.85%. This indicates that GCMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TKO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCMGTKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

6.85%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.57%

24.34%

+6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.10%

33.00%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.09%

33.07%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

33.07%

-3.49%

Dividends

GCMG vs. TKO - Dividend Comparison

GCMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than TKO's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.
3.77%3.98%3.59%4.91%5.39%3.14%
TKO
TKO Group Holdings Inc.
1.71%1.10%0.00%4.73%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GCMG vs. TKO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GCM Grosvenor Inc. and TKO Group Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GCMG vs. TKO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GCM Grosvenor Inc. and TKO Group Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GCMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.41M and revenue of 124.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

TKO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GCMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92M and revenue of 124.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

TKO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 338.50M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

GCMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a net income of 17.74M and revenue of 124.78M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

TKO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TKO Group Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 248.20M and revenue of 1.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GCMG and TKO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCMG has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to TKO (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCMG dropped -51.80% vs TKO's -28.35%.

GCMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCMG and TKO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer