GCMG vs. PJT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT).

Performance

GCMG vs. PJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GCMG vs. PJT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GCMG GCM Grosvenor Inc.	-12.52%	-4.35%	43.01%	24.65%	-24.03%	-18.91%	22.20%
PJT PJT Partners Inc.	-16.29%	6.62%	56.23%	40.00%	0.92%	2.62%	9.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GCMG : $1.96B PJT : $4.02B
EPS GCMG : $0.23 PJT : $4.67
PE Ratio GCMG : 42.78 PJT : 29.91
PEG Ratio GCMG : 0.35 PJT : 3.82
PS Ratio GCMG : 3.47 PJT : 3.14
PB Ratio GCMG : 72.72 PJT : 4.32
Total Revenue (TTM) GCMG : $559.22M PJT : $1.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) GCMG : $556.95M PJT : $908.92M
EBITDA (TTM) GCMG : $182.15M PJT : $419.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCMG achieves a -12.52% return, which is significantly higher than PJT's -16.29% return.

GCMG

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -14.49%
• YTD: -12.52%
• 6M: -17.05%
• 1Y: -23.00%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: -0.36%
• 10Y*: —

PJT

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -5.23%
• YTD: -16.29%
• 6M: -21.13%
• 1Y: 1.97%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: 16.92%
• 10Y*: 20.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GCMG vs. PJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCMG

GCMG Risk / Return Rank: 8
GCMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GCMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GCMG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GCMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GCMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

PJT

PJT Risk / Return Rank: 41
PJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PJT Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PJT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCMG vs. PJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCMG	PJT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	0.06	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.06	0.30	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.04	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	0.10	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.06	0.30	-2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCMG vs. PJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the PJT Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCMG and PJT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCMG	PJT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.78	0.06	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.56	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.61	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between GCMG and PJT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GCMG vs. PJT - Dividend Comparison

GCMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than PJT's 0.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCMG GCM Grosvenor Inc.	4.69%	3.98%	3.59%	4.91%	5.39%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PJT PJT Partners Inc.	0.72%	0.60%	0.63%	0.98%	1.36%	4.32%	0.27%	0.44%	0.52%	0.44%	0.65%

Drawdowns

GCMG vs. PJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCMG drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, smaller than the maximum PJT drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCMG and PJT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCMG	PJT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.80%	-58.44%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.41%	-32.47%	+6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.64%	-37.80%	-11.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.75%	-26.88%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-12.80%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.24%	11.36%	-0.12%

Volatility

GCMG vs. PJT - Volatility Comparison

GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) at 9.12%. This indicates that GCMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCMG	PJT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.36%	9.12%	+3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.55%	23.11%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.65%	31.80%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.81%	30.19%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.92%	33.76%	-4.84%

Financials

GCMG vs. PJT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GCM Grosvenor Inc. and PJT Partners Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GCMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a gross profit of 175.99M and revenue of 177.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

PJT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported a gross profit of 531.72M and revenue of 535.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

GCMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported an operating income of 63.97M and revenue of 177.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

PJT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported an operating income of 122.66M and revenue of 535.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

GCMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a net income of 18.98M and revenue of 177.10M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

PJT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported a net income of 53.36M and revenue of 535.16M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.