PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCMG vs. PJT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCMG vs. PJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCMG achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than PJT's -7.26% return.


GCMG

1D
0.66%
1M
16.18%
YTD
9.51%
6M
8.46%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
23.47%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*

PJT

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-7.26%
6M
-9.61%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
30.95%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCMG vs. PJT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.
9.51%-4.35%43.01%24.65%-24.03%-18.91%11.56%
PJT
PJT Partners Inc.
-7.26%6.62%56.23%40.00%0.92%2.62%7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GCMG and PJT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCMG:

$2.48B

PJT:

$6.69B

EPS

GCMG:

$0.31

PJT:

$4.70

PE Ratio

GCMG:

38.67

PJT:

32.91

PEG Ratio

GCMG:

0.32

PJT:

4.20

PS Ratio

GCMG:

4.34

PJT:

3.40

PB Ratio

GCMG:

97.43

PJT:

24.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCMG:

$558.85M

PJT:

$1.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCMG:

$386.19M

PJT:

$590.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

GCMG:

$174.90M

PJT:

$412.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCMG vs. PJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCMG
GCMG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GCMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GCMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PJT
PJT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCMG vs. PJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCMGPJTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.03

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.02

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

0.05

+0.78

GCMG vs. PJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the PJT Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCMG and PJT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCMG vs. PJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCMG drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, smaller than the maximum PJT drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCMG and PJT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCMGPJTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-58.44%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.41%

-32.47%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.29%

-32.47%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.04%

-37.80%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.81%

-19.00%

+8.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-13.00%

-9.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.68%

14.41%

-1.73%

Volatility

GCMG vs. PJT - Volatility Comparison

GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) at 8.76%. This indicates that GCMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCMGPJTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

8.76%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.07%

21.80%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.46%

29.29%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.88%

30.17%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.45%

33.59%

-4.14%

Dividends

GCMG vs. PJT - Dividend Comparison

GCMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than PJT's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.
3.87%3.98%3.59%4.91%5.39%3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJT
PJT Partners Inc.
0.65%0.60%0.63%0.98%1.36%4.32%0.27%0.44%0.52%0.44%0.65%

Financials

GCMG vs. PJT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GCM Grosvenor Inc. and PJT Partners Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
124.78M
418.20M
(GCMG) Total Revenue
(PJT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GCMG vs. PJT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GCM Grosvenor Inc. and PJT Partners Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
33.0%
Portfolio components
GCMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.41M and revenue of 124.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

PJT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported a gross profit of 137.94M and revenue of 418.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

GCMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92M and revenue of 124.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

PJT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported an operating income of 80.34M and revenue of 418.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

GCMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GCM Grosvenor Inc. reported a net income of 17.74M and revenue of 124.78M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

PJT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PJT Partners Inc. reported a net income of 60.50M and revenue of 418.20M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GCMG and PJT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCMG has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to PJT (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCMG dropped -51.80% vs PJT's -58.44%.

GCMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCMG and PJT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer