GCINX vs. GCBLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCINX (Green Century MSCI International Index Fund) and GCBLX (Green Century Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - GCINX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Green Century, while GCBLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Green Century. Over the past 5 years, GCINX returned 3.95%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for GCBLX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCINX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for GCBLX.

Performance

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Century MSCI International Index Fund (GCINX) and Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCINX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than GCBLX's 7.54% return.

GCINX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 5.49%
• 1Y: 8.25%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: —

GCBLX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 4.30%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCINX Green Century MSCI International Index Fund	3.34%	17.54%	4.33%	16.63%	-21.35%	12.53%	12.18%	25.02%	-14.33%	23.59%
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund	7.54%	8.58%	9.67%	11.78%	-16.19%	16.43%	15.97%	20.90%	-2.14%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GCINX and GCBLX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.80

The correlation between GCINX and GCBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCINX vs. GCBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCINX

GCINX Risk / Return Rank: 6
GCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
GCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GCBLX

GCBLX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GCBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GCBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GCBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GCBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GCBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century MSCI International Index Fund (GCINX) and Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCINX	GCBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.91	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	2.81	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.35	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	2.24	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.95	9.86	-7.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the GCBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCINX and GCBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCINX	GCBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	1.91	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.50	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.48	-0.03

Drawdowns

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCINX drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum GCBLX drawdown of -64.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCINX and GCBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCINX	GCBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	-64.30%	+30.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-6.81%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.66%	-13.03%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.26%	-21.88%	-12.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	0.00%	-1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-14.56%	+6.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	1.54%	+2.02%

Volatility

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Volatility Comparison

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund (GCINX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) at 2.30%. This indicates that GCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCINX	GCBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	2.30%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.41%	6.28%	+6.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	7.97%	+7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	11.35%	+5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.47%	11.59%	+4.88%

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCINX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GCBLX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCINX vs. GCBLX - Dividend Comparison

GCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than GCBLX's 4.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund	4.52%	4.86%	7.00%	3.02%	1.88%	3.99%	3.61%	1.92%	2.36%	1.29%	2.14%	2.97%
GCINX Green Century MSCI International Index Fund	3.87%	4.00%	1.53%	1.07%	1.04%	2.94%	0.55%	1.14%	2.21%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCINX and GCBLX in my portfolio?

GCINX and GCBLX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCINX or GCBLX?

GCINX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to GCBLX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCINX dropped -34.26% vs GCBLX's -64.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.