GCINX vs. FAOSX
GCINX (Green Century MSCI International Index Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCINX returned 3.95%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCINX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GCINX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCINX Green Century MSCI International Index Fund | 3.34% | 17.54% | 4.33% | 16.63% | -21.35% | 12.53% | 12.18% | 25.02% | -14.33% | 20.36% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCINX and FAOSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCINX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCINX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
GCINX
FAOSX
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century MSCI International Index Fund (GCINX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCINX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.34 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | -0.59 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCINX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | -0.27 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.23 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCINX drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCINX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCINX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -36.24% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -7.26% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -13.96% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | -36.24% | +1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -5.86% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -7.93% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.97% | -0.41% |
Volatility
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Green Century MSCI International Index Fund (GCINX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCINX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 0.00% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 4.08% | +8.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 9.18% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 16.72% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 16.68% | -0.21% |
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCINX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCINX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
GCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% |
GCINX Green Century MSCI International Index Fund | 3.87% | 4.00% | 1.53% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 2.94% | 0.55% | 1.14% | 2.21% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCINX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCINX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCINX dropped -34.26% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
GCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCINX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer