GCIIX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GCIIX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCIIX returned 12.89%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for FHLFX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GCIIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 10.72% return.

GCIIX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 13.52%
• 1Y: 33.74%
• 3Y*: 24.44%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 11.97%

FHLFX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	14.14%	40.72%	9.65%	20.80%	-14.91%	11.71%	7.83%	18.52%	-14.31%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	10.72%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GCIIX and FHLFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.97

The correlation between GCIIX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCIIX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCIIX

GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCIIX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.68	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.39	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.31	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.26	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	8.44	+2.10

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCIIX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCIIX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.08%	-33.58%	-27.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-11.37%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	-13.62%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.58%	-29.36%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.02%	-6.07%	-8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.03%	+0.26%

Volatility

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.75%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCIIX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	4.75%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	12.71%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.80%	15.27%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	16.06%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	17.65%	-0.87%

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCIIX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than FHLFX's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.13%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	6.82%	7.78%	9.24%	2.81%	3.94%	6.33%	1.86%	2.46%	1.94%	1.62%	2.51%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCIIX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, GCIIX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCIIX or FHLFX?

GCIIX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to FHLFX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCIIX dropped -61.08% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.