PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCGIX vs. GSPKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a -3.20% return, which is significantly lower than GSPKX's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GCGIX has outperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 16.52%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.


GCGIX

1D
2.97%
1M
-2.72%
6M
-0.87%
YTD
-3.20%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
16.52%
ALL TIME*
9.48%

GSPKX

1D
1.32%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.75%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.64%
ALL TIME*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
-3.20%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.37%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GCGIX and GSPKX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.92

The correlation between GCGIX and GSPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCGIX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCGIXGSPKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

2.37

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

11.61

-10.83

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the GSPKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCGIX and GSPKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than GSPKX's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and GSPKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCGIXGSPKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.78%

-51.90%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-7.83%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-20.51%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-22.34%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.94%

-32.70%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-1.24%

-7.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.74%

-5.95%

-14.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

1.60%

+4.26%

Volatility

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) at 2.76%. This indicates that GCGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCGIXGSPKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

2.76%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.98%

8.46%

+5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

10.54%

+7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

16.07%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

16.88%

+4.78%

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCGIX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison

GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than GSPKX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.74%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
6.00%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GCGIX and GSPKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCGIX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to GSPKX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCGIX dropped -65.78% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.

GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCGIX and GSPKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer