GCC vs. VUSV
GCC (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCC is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.
Performance
GCC vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than VUSV's 7.46% return.
GCC
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 37.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
VUSV
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCC vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 18.63% | 4.17% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 7.46% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCC and VUSV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCC vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank
GCC
VUSV
GCC vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCC | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCC | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 2.23 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
GCC vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and VUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCC | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.19% | -7.06% | -56.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -0.52% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.91% | -1.31% | -33.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility
GCC vs. VUSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCC | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 11.94% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 11.94% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 11.94% | +2.83% |
GCC vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCC vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison
GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 5.60% | 6.64% | 3.51% | 3.68% | 22.49% | 9.76% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCC and VUSV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCC.
GCC has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
GCC is categorized as Commodities, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GCC and 0.30% for VUSV.
Find the right allocation for GCC and VUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer