PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCC vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GCC vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GCC vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GCC
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
13.19%20.01%15.13%-3.72%7.74%2.01%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
8.77%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's 8.77% return.


GCC

1D
0.42%
1M
2.70%
YTD
13.19%
6M
19.55%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
7.15%

GDMN

1D
9.38%
1M
-27.72%
YTD
8.77%
6M
31.63%
1Y
140.14%
3Y*
65.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCC vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GCC vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCC
GCC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCC vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

2.20

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

2.34

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.69

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

12.63

-2.56

GCC vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCC and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.20

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.94

-0.87

Correlation

The correlation between GCC and GDMN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GCC vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than GDMN's 2.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
GCC
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
5.86%6.64%3.51%3.68%22.49%9.76%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.48%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%

Drawdowns

GCC vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and GDMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-52.82%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-39.03%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-28.60%

+26.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-18.45%

-16.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

11.39%

-8.30%

Volatility

GCC vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is 5.30%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.97%. This indicates that GCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GCCGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

24.97%

-19.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

53.89%

-38.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

63.99%

-46.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

47.19%

-30.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.76%

47.19%

-32.43%