GCBLX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
GCBLX is managed by Green Century. It was launched on Mar 17, 1992. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund | -5.23% | 8.58% | 9.67% | 11.78% | -16.19% | 16.43% | 15.97% | 20.90% | -2.14% | 12.78% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 9.23% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCBLX achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 9.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GCBLX having a 7.15% annualized return and PUDZX not far behind at 6.92%.
GCBLX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -4.65%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCBLX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCBLX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
GCBLX
PUDZX
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.98 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 2.57 | -1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.40 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 2.35 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 13.15 | -10.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.98 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.88 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCBLX and PUDZX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
GCBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than PUDZX's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund | 5.13% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.02% | 1.88% | 3.99% | 3.61% | 1.92% | 2.36% | 1.29% | 2.14% | 2.97% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.17% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCBLX drawdown since its inception was -64.30%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCBLX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.30% | -21.53% | -42.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -8.20% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -17.98% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.38% | -21.53% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -2.44% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -5.31% | -9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.47% | +0.26% |
Volatility
GCBLX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.60%. This indicates that GCBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCBLX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.60% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.73% | 6.24% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 9.70% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.30% | 10.58% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 9.70% | +1.87% |