GCBLX vs. AYBLX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GCBLX (Green Century Balanced Fund) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GCBLX returned 8.53%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for AYBLX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCBLX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.

Performance

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCBLX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GCBLX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.

GCBLX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 11.48%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: 4.88%
• 10Y*: 8.53%

AYBLX

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 29.79%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund	5.76%	8.58%	9.67%	11.78%	-16.19%	16.43%	15.97%	20.90%	-2.14%	12.78%
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund	12.96%	19.80%	9.64%	15.41%	-14.39%	15.48%	12.92%	22.22%	-4.43%	15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GCBLX and AYBLX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997	0.79

The correlation between GCBLX and AYBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GCBLX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCBLX

GCBLX Risk / Return Rank: 35
GCBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GCBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GCBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GCBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GCBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

AYBLX

AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCBLX	AYBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	3.13	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	4.40	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.57	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	4.87	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.91	22.57	-14.66

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCBLX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCBLX drawdown since its inception was -64.30%, which is greater than AYBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCBLX and AYBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCBLX	AYBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.30%	-36.28%	-28.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.81%	-6.41%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-13.39%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	-20.26%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.38%	-24.24%	+1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-1.42%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.54%	-3.78%	-10.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.38%	+0.19%

Volatility

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) is 3.28%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that GCBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCBLX	AYBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.76%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.87%	7.89%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.42%	9.98%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.42%	11.14%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.57%	11.33%	+0.24%

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCBLX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCBLX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

GCBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than AYBLX's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund	3.27%	3.58%	2.59%	1.76%	3.23%	8.61%	4.12%	6.03%	9.97%	9.42%	2.63%	4.14%
GCBLX Green Century Balanced Fund	4.59%	4.86%	7.00%	3.02%	1.88%	3.99%	3.61%	1.92%	2.36%	1.29%	2.14%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCBLX and AYBLX in my portfolio?

GCBLX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCBLX or AYBLX?

AYBLX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to GCBLX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCBLX dropped -64.30% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.