GCAL vs. VUSV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCAL (Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCAL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

GCAL vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF (GCAL) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCAL achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than VUSV's 7.46% return.

GCAL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUSV

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCAL vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GCAL Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF	1.59%	0.71%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	7.46%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GCAL and VUSV is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

GCAL vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCAL

GCAL Risk / Return Rank: 78
GCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCAL vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF (GCAL) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCAL	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCAL	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	2.23	-1.06

Drawdowns

GCAL vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAL drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum VUSV drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAL and VUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCAL	VUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-7.06%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.52%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-1.31%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GCAL	VUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44%	11.94%	-9.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	11.94%	-8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	11.94%	-8.31%

GCAL vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GCAL and VUSV have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

GCAL vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison

GCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GCAL Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF	3.32%	3.06%	1.41%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCAL and VUSV in my portfolio?

GCAL and VUSV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GCAL or VUSV?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCAL or VUSV?

GCAL and VUSV have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GCAL or VUSV?

GCAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between GCAL and VUSV?

GCAL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard.