GCAL vs. QPUX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GCAL (Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF) and QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCAL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GCAL charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QPUX.

Performance

GCAL vs. QPUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF (GCAL) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCAL achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than QPUX's -68.95% return.

GCAL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -1.25%
• 6M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.61%

QPUX

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -37.41%
• 6M: -55.03%
• YTD: -68.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GCAL Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF	$1.12M	$835.57K	$864.67K
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF	$2.53M	$2.77M	$8.34M

GCAL vs. QPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GCAL Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF	0.97%	3.99%
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF	-68.95%	-55.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GCAL and QPUX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

GCAL vs. QPUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCAL

GCAL Risk / Return Rank: 80
GCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QPUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCAL vs. QPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF (GCAL) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCAL	QPUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	—	—

Drawdowns

GCAL vs. QPUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAL drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum QPUX drawdown of -95.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAL and QPUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCAL	QPUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-95.05%	+90.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-93.84%	+92.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-71.53%	+70.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GCAL	QPUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	198.24%	-195.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.56%	198.24%	-194.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.56%	198.24%	-194.68%

GCAL vs. QPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCAL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QPUX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCAL vs. QPUX - Dividend Comparison

GCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, while QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GCAL Goldman Sachs Dynamic California Municipal Income ETF	3.30%	3.06%	1.41%
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCAL and QPUX in my portfolio?

GCAL and QPUX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GCAL or QPUX?

On fees, GCAL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCAL or QPUX?

GCAL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GCAL or QPUX?

GCAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.

What is the main difference between GCAL and QPUX?

GCAL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QPUX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GCAL and 1.29% for QPUX.