GCAD vs. MMKT
GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCAD is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Gabelli, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GCAD returned 35.52% vs 3.81% for MMKT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. GCAD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
GCAD vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCAD achieves a 14.09% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.44% return.
GCAD
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 14.09%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCAD vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 14.09% | 39.28% | 3.75% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.44% | 4.13% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCAD and MMKT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between GCAD and MMKT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCAD vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
GCAD
MMKT
GCAD vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCAD | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -59.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 15.14 | -13.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 153.44 | -151.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | 910.67 | -902.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCAD | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 16.49 | -14.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 17.60 | -16.04 |
Drawdowns
GCAD vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCAD drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAD and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCAD | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.14% | -0.04% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | -0.02% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | 0.00% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -0.00% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 0.00% | +4.32% |
Volatility
GCAD vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that GCAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCAD | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 0.05% | +7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 0.13% | +16.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 0.23% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 0.23% | +18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 0.23% | +18.26% |
GCAD vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCAD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GCAD vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than MMKT's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 1.81% | 2.06% | 4.94% | 3.62% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCAD and MMKT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCAD has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCAD dropped -16.14% vs MMKT's -0.04%.
On 1-year performance, GCAD leads with 35.52% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GCAD has performed better with a 35.52% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.
MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.81% for GCAD.
GCAD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GCAD and 0.20% for MMKT.
MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCAD and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer