PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBTC vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBTC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -32.86% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


GBTC

1D
-1.10%
1M
-22.12%
YTD
-32.86%
6M
-32.70%
1Y
-45.93%
3Y*
36.17%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
44.37%

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBTC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and WNTR is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.81

The correlation between GBTC and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBTC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBTC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBTCWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.33

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.73

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

6.99

-8.47

GBTC vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBTCWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.91%

-42.65%

-47.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.37%

-42.65%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.37%

-4.02%

-49.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.45%

-20.87%

-22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.15%

16.66%

+14.49%

Volatility

GBTC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) is 13.27%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that GBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBTCWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.27%

18.14%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

46.41%

-11.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.31%

53.16%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.02%

53.31%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.44%

53.31%

+28.13%

GBTC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBTC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBTC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to GBTC (13.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs -45.93% for GBTC. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, GBTC has been the lower-risk option at 13.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs -45.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

GBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBTC and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer