PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSS.L achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than GGRG.L's 5.29% return.


GBSS.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
3.71%
6M
5.10%
1Y
33.15%
3Y*
27.74%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
13.99%

GGRG.L

1D
0.22%
1M
4.59%
YTD
5.29%
6M
5.72%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSS.L
Gold Bullion Securities
3.71%53.13%27.82%6.96%11.51%-3.12%19.73%14.42%4.17%1.53%
GGRG.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.29%8.36%11.10%11.54%-3.39%20.90%12.53%29.81%-5.38%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSS.L and GGRG.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.10

The correlation between GBSS.L and GGRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSS.L
GBSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GGRG.L
GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSS.LGGRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.02

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

7.78

-2.84

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSS.L and GGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSS.LGGRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.60

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.76

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.93

-0.27

Drawdowns

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than GGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSS.L and GGRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSS.LGGRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-22.15%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.92%

-8.70%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-16.17%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-16.17%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.16%

0.00%

-16.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-2.91%

-10.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

2.26%

+4.44%

Volatility

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that GBSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSS.LGGRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.62%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

7.97%

+11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.96%

11.02%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

12.13%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

13.52%

+2.25%

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSS.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSS.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSS.L and GGRG.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRG.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBSS.L.

GBSS.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while GGRG.L is Global Equities. GBSS.L tracks Gold, while GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBSS.L and 0.38% for GGRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSS.L and GGRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer