PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSP.L vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBSP.L is traded in GBp, while AAAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAAU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSP.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 1.05% return.


GBSP.L

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
3.18%
6M
5.42%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.30%

AAAU

1D
-3.04%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
1.05%
6M
2.57%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
26.75%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
3.18%63.29%25.01%11.75%-1.73%-4.92%21.84%14.56%7.43%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
1.05%52.38%29.13%7.32%11.34%-3.10%21.34%13.68%8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSP.L and AAAU is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.64

The correlation between GBSP.L and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSP.L vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSP.L
GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSP.LAAAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.65

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

4.24

+0.26

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSP.L and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSP.LAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.16

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.06

-0.68

Drawdowns

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSP.L and AAAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSP.LAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-22.73%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-18.69%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-18.69%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

-18.69%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.96%

-18.69%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-5.99%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

7.24%

-0.36%

Volatility

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 4.79%. This indicates that GBSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSP.LAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

4.79%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

21.75%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.78%

25.22%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

16.63%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

16.28%

-0.72%

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBSP.L vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSP.L nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSP.L and AAAU have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GBSP.L.

GBSP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while AAAU is Gold. GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBSP.L and 0.18% for AAAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSP.L and AAAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer