GBRE.L vs. TREG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBRE.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and TREG.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from State Street and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBRE.L returned 2.07%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for TREG.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GBRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TREG.L.

Performance

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBRE.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than TREG.L's 4.19% return.

GBRE.L

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: 3.81%

TREG.L

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.04%
• YTD: 4.19%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: 7.92%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	6.19%	1.33%	0.96%	5.25%	-16.29%	32.07%	-13.82%	11.27%
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	4.19%	6.62%	2.78%	7.64%	-16.77%	31.33%	-10.04%	10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GBRE.L and TREG.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019	0.96

The correlation between GBRE.L and TREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GBRE.L	TREG.L
Real Estate	99.9%	98.4%
Industrials	0.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	0.0%
Utilities	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBRE.L

GBRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GBRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GBRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GBRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GBRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TREG.L

TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBRE.L	TREG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.03	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.53	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	4.06	+0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the TREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBRE.L and TREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBRE.L	TREG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	1.03	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.23	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.24	+0.13

Drawdowns

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, roughly equal to the maximum TREG.L drawdown of -35.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBRE.L and TREG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBRE.L	TREG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.15%	-35.66%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	-9.39%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.12%	-15.30%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.39%	-26.89%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-5.75%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.97%	-10.39%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.91%	-0.35%

Volatility

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBRE.L	TREG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	3.52%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.79%	9.13%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	11.41%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.37%	14.66%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	16.96%	-0.98%

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBRE.L vs. TREG.L - Dividend Comparison

GBRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TREG.L's 3.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	0.75%	1.45%	2.73%	2.66%	2.84%	1.79%	2.76%	3.25%	4.30%	3.99%	2.40%	2.09%
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.50%	3.57%	3.48%	3.64%	4.54%	1.82%	4.49%	3.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBRE.L and TREG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GBRE.L and TREG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GBRE.L or TREG.L?

On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBRE.L or TREG.L?

TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBRE.L.

What is the main difference between GBRE.L and TREG.L?

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBRE.L and 0.25% for TREG.L.