GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L
GBRE.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and SWLD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while SWLD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBRE.L returned 2.07%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for SWLD.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SWLD.L.
Performance
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBRE.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than SWLD.L's 10.05% return.
GBRE.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
SWLD.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.19% | 1.33% | 0.96% | 5.25% | -16.29% | 32.07% | -13.82% | 9.71% |
SWLD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.05% | 12.85% | 21.19% | 17.70% | -8.06% | 23.66% | 12.00% | 14.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBRE.L and SWLD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GBRE.L and SWLD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
Industrials
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
Financial Services
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
Utilities
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
Basic Materials
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Communication Services
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Consumer Cyclical
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Consumer Defensive
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Energy
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Healthcare
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Technology
GBRE.L
-
SWLD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBRE.L
SWLD.L
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBRE.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.51 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 4.13 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 16.60 | -12.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBRE.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.70 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.00 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.92 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, which is greater than SWLD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBRE.L and SWLD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBRE.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.15% | -25.85% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -6.57% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -18.65% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.39% | -18.65% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -0.19% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.97% | -3.17% | -6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 1.64% | +0.92% |
Volatility
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that GBRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBRE.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 2.52% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 7.23% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 10.06% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 13.21% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 15.25% | +0.73% |
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBRE.L vs. SWLD.L - Dividend Comparison
GBRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while SWLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.75% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 2.84% | 1.79% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 4.30% | 3.99% | 2.40% | 2.09% |
SWLD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBRE.L and SWLD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBRE.L.
GBRE.L is categorized as REIT, while SWLD.L is Global Equities. GBRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while SWLD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBRE.L and 0.12% for SWLD.L.
Find the right allocation for GBRE.L and SWLD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer