PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBRE.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from State Street and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBRE.L returned 2.07%/yr vs 2.03%/yr for EPRA.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GBRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EPRA.L.

Performance

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBRE.L is traded in GBP, while EPRA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EPRA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBRE.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than EPRA.L's 6.79% return.

GBRE.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
6.19%
6M
5.11%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.81%

EPRA.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.50%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBRE.L
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		6.19%1.33%0.96%5.25%-16.29%32.07%-13.82%16.79%-0.14%1.03%
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR		6.79%3.12%1.31%4.40%-16.02%27.84%-11.99%17.30%-0.56%0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GBRE.L and EPRA.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.96

The correlation between GBRE.L and EPRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GBRE.L
EPRA.L

Real Estate

99.9%
99.6%

Industrials

0.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.1%

Utilities

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.4%

Real Estate

GBRE.L
99.9%
EPRA.L
99.6%

Industrials

GBRE.L
0.0%
EPRA.L
0.0%

Financial Services

GBRE.L
0.0%
EPRA.L
0.1%

Utilities

GBRE.L
0.0%
EPRA.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Communication Services

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Energy

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Healthcare

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.0%

Technology

GBRE.L

-

EPRA.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR

Often compared with GBRE.L:
GBRE.L vs. CMOP.LGBRE.L vs. BBOX.LGBRE.L vs. IUSP.LGBRE.L vs. VTIGBRE.L vs. VGTGBRE.L vs. QQQGBRE.L vs. VOO
Often compared with EPRA.L:
EPRA.L vs. TRET.DEEPRA.L vs. TRET.ASEPRA.L vs. TREG.LEPRA.L vs. SPY2.DEEPRA.L vs. IQSA.DEEPRA.L vs. LCWD.LEPRA.L vs. VNQ

Return for Risk

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GBRE.L
GBRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
EPRA.L
EPRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GBRE.LEPRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.98
1.21

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
1.80

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

5.00

-0.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBRE.L and EPRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GBRE.LEPRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.21

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.15

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.19

+0.18

Drawdowns

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, roughly equal to the maximum EPRA.L drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBRE.L and EPRA.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GBRE.LEPRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-35.65%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.95%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-17.01%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.39%

-26.59%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-3.51%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

-9.83%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.55%

+0.01%

Volatility

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) at 3.19%. This indicates that GBRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GBRE.LEPRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.19%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

8.50%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

10.52%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

13.74%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

15.50%

+0.48%

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRA.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBRE.L vs. EPRA.L - Dividend Comparison

GBRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPRA.L
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBRE.L
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		0.75%1.45%2.73%2.66%2.84%1.79%2.76%3.25%4.30%3.99%2.40%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

GBRE.L and EPRA.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBRE.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBRE.L and 0.10% for EPRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBRE.L and EPRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer