PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPG.L vs. JG15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than JG15.L's 0.15% return.


GBPG.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.56%
YTD
3.11%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
10Y*

JG15.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.49%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
3.11%2.23%0.17%4.28%-9.15%-1.16%
JG15.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)
0.15%5.58%1.79%3.85%-5.75%-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPG.L and JG15.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2021

0.88

The correlation between GBPG.L and JG15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JG15.L
JG15.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JG15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JG15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JG15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JG15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JG15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBPG.LJG15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.24

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

3.91

-1.33

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the JG15.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPG.L and JG15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBPG.LJG15.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.26

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.35

-0.39

Drawdowns

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.04%, which is greater than JG15.L's maximum drawdown of -11.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPG.L and JG15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPG.LJG15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-11.34%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-2.35%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-2.35%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.03%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-2.40%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.75%

+0.42%

Volatility

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) at 0.85%. This indicates that GBPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JG15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPG.LJG15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.85%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

2.07%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

2.32%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.41%

3.05%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

2.55%

+2.86%

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GBPG.L and JG15.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBPG.L vs. JG15.L - Dividend Comparison

GBPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than JG15.L's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.09%4.13%4.10%3.35%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JG15.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)
3.87%3.71%3.44%2.28%0.68%0.12%0.34%0.91%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPG.L and JG15.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPG.L and JG15.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

Both ETFs track FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPG.L and JG15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer